DL
19 дек. 2015 г.
Again, with no formal SAS training and minimal statistics background. I found taking the first course and then this course - week after week my knowledge grew in a consistent and organized fashion.
AM
2 дек. 2015 г.
Very good for beginners. concept explanation as well as coding were great. doesn't take too long to finish. I enrolled regression modeling course by Wesleyan and waiting to start.
автор: Claude F
•14 февр. 2016 г.
Lectures are well realized (animation, change in contexts) and peer review process.
автор: Cesar
•26 апр. 2016 г.
Una buena forma de introducirte en las herramientas para el análisis de datos
автор: ayush t
•5 июня 2016 г.
Videos are good and to the point.
Animation is very user friendly.
автор: Patricio S C
•17 апр. 2018 г.
Good course, but need more direct feedback from professionals.
автор: Stephen M
•11 нояб. 2020 г.
It is an interactive session, with good notes and videos.
автор: Yogesh A
•23 мая 2016 г.
Very good from a conceptual point of view.
автор: Omar M E
•27 авг. 2020 г.
Excellent course in describing statistics
автор: Rawane M
•8 июня 2018 г.
Covers a good deal of material.
автор: Kaleeswaran .
•28 нояб. 2020 г.
Good
автор: Naomi F M
•7 мар. 2017 г.
Had important problems with SAS which were due to a bug in the software but did not receive any help from moderators. However the course was good and interesting.
автор: Daisuke H
•3 мая 2016 г.
There was no explanation about background mathematics. Grading metrics are unclear because assessment of assignments are only peer grading.
автор: Jin W
•21 апр. 2016 г.
Very basic introduction and not thorough or mathematical enough.
автор: Marta M
•22 дек. 2016 г.
Interesting but very superficial I would say.
автор: Adam K
•7 апр. 2019 г.
We don't have to do the calculus, but some acknowledgement that mathematics, and not syntax, is actually responsible for how these tools operate would be great.
автор: Global L O P J G U
•15 июня 2020 г.
too complicated