19 дек. 2015 г.
Again, with no formal SAS training and minimal statistics background. I found taking the first course and then this course - week after week my knowledge grew in a consistent and organized fashion.
2 дек. 2015 г.
Very good for beginners. concept explanation as well as coding were great. doesn't take too long to finish. I enrolled regression modeling course by Wesleyan and waiting to start.
автор: Claude F•
14 февр. 2016 г.
Lectures are well realized (animation, change in contexts) and peer review process.
26 апр. 2016 г.
Una buena forma de introducirte en las herramientas para el análisis de datos
автор: ayush t•
5 июня 2016 г.
Videos are good and to the point.
Animation is very user friendly.
автор: Patricio S C•
17 апр. 2018 г.
Good course, but need more direct feedback from professionals.
автор: Stephen M•
11 нояб. 2020 г.
It is an interactive session, with good notes and videos.
автор: Yogesh A•
23 мая 2016 г.
Very good from a conceptual point of view.
автор: Omar M E•
27 авг. 2020 г.
Excellent course in describing statistics
автор: Rawane M•
8 июня 2018 г.
Covers a good deal of material.
автор: Kaleeswaran .•
28 нояб. 2020 г.
автор: Naomi F M•
7 мар. 2017 г.
Had important problems with SAS which were due to a bug in the software but did not receive any help from moderators. However the course was good and interesting.
автор: Daisuke H•
3 мая 2016 г.
There was no explanation about background mathematics. Grading metrics are unclear because assessment of assignments are only peer grading.
автор: Jin W•
21 апр. 2016 г.
Very basic introduction and not thorough or mathematical enough.
автор: Marta M•
22 дек. 2016 г.
Interesting but very superficial I would say.
автор: Adam K•
7 апр. 2019 г.
We don't have to do the calculus, but some acknowledgement that mathematics, and not syntax, is actually responsible for how these tools operate would be great.
автор: Global L O P J G U•
15 июня 2020 г.