great introductory stuff, great way to keep in touch with tensorflow's new tools, and the instructor is absolutely phenomenal. love the enthusiasm and the interactions with andrew are a joy to watch.
A really good course that builds up the knowledge over the concepts covered in Course 1. All the ideas are applicable in real world scenario and this is what makes the course that much more valuable!
автор: Stephen M•
The course simply does not cover much information. The whole course could be compacted into a decent one hour lecture. Andrew Ng has some great courses on machine learning but I don't believe this to be one of them.
автор: Kalana I•
The course material is good and the lectures are great but rating it low to bring attention to the assignments which were old and incomplete. They really need to be updated. Specially week 4.
автор: Klemen V•
In my opinion there is to little background explanation. There were errors in Programming Assignment
in week 3 and 4. I had to look in forum discussion so I could complete the exercise
автор: Dmitry T•
weeks from 1-3 were perfect.
But the programming assignment on week 4 needs to be fixed. Please add hints and examples, otherwise it is just a headache
автор: Jose R•
No enough time spend in the actual code which limits the learning on the understanding of the concepts with implementation. Doubt how useful this is
автор: Muhammad R R M•
Last exercise is so bad. It didn't even discuss about flow function, why it's need 26 last layer? isn't it should be only 3?
автор: Dmitriy S•
Absolutely awful grader. You spend most of the time figuring out errors and intentions of the grader writer.
автор: Matthew R•
Very superficial look at deep learning. A lot of the programming assignments had little to no context.
автор: Francisco R G•
Repetitive chapters, repetitive info on videos, and not very useful final test. They have to review it.
автор: Jin C•
It's too easy for an intermediate machine learning leaner, and it's little about naive TensorFlow.
автор: Roger G A•
Specially in week 4, big gap between information taught in the lecture, and the last assignment.
автор: Pouya K•
poorly designed exercises
poorly designed material that all could be said in just 1 or 2 weeks
автор: Jair N•
The content are good, but the audio is low and the exercises are not well documented.
автор: Adith k•
There's hardly any video time. We can finish the whole course in a day
автор: Apoorv V•
Average content. The last assignment for week 4 was structured quite poorly.
coding assignment should be included otherwise it is easy to get certificate
автор: mukul k•
expecting more advance topics instead of just using Keras.
автор: Oliver J•
The last assignment is poorly designed and a real pain.
автор: Hanzhao L•
The practices were poorly designed.
автор: Cynthia E•
Assignments are not well designed
автор: Gunes D S•
Very little content, ridiculously repetitive. Missing info in the last assignment made me waste a lot of time. I wouldn't mind spending time on that assignment if it had been actually challenging. Course designers should consider putting serious time and effort into the preparation of the hands on materials. There is some useful information in this course, but I passed without learning much because of poor design. I still have no idea how to design a good model based on the data set, how many filters to use in each convolution, how many layers in total, how many nodes in the dense layer, etc. The instructor keeps recommending "trial and error", which is fair but I would expect the discussions to be a bit more thoughtful and deeper than that, especially given the price of this "professional certification". This course is falsely advertised as intermediate level, it is actually introductory level, albeit being too simplistic compared to some other great substantial introductory level courses on Coursera.
автор: Alessandro S•
Honestly this course was a bit of a disappointment, didn't really learn anything that can improve how effective i can produce a neural network, on the assignments the hardest parts was coding tasks that was never explained in the course, like reading and copying files, and that has not really anything to do on how to build a neural network, some of the examples provided did not really worked (as the accuracy was poor and always over-fitting), for the last assignment i cheated as using image generator lead to a really poor results so i just skipped and train the model using directly the images.
My suggestion spend more time on what strategy are used to improve the model when the results are poor as the model under-fit or over-fit, otherwise it looks like you add and remove layers until you got lucky.
автор: Fabian A R G•
I am sorry for the 1 star but is time that deeplearningAI take course content difficulty a bit more precise. I know and I appreciate a lot what you are doing on spreading the knowledge of AI through many varied content, nonetheless if you put that the course is intermediate you should aim to make it intermediate. This is pre-introductory level course and I would have appreciated knowing that so I just skip it an go through a more advanced option. I still finished it as I already paid for it. It is still a well organized and fun course as usual, the problem is that this has absolutely no value in terms of "real world" examples as you put it...
автор: Tal F•
What a disaster! I spent more time trying to game the scoring service into accepting a correct answer (and reading in the forum how other frustrated users managed to do it) than actually learning about tensor flow. Such a shame because there were some interesting topics. There is no TA answering questions in the forum either. It doesn't feel like any effort has been made to keep the course current and updated, addressing issues, etc. And the lab work was actually very repetitive - some were almost identical to previous ones.
автор: Brad G•
Final lab was a total shit-show. Made you jump through hoops to run off and learn minor things which weren't covered in the course but were highly germaine to passing. Tons of technical problems with getting final lab to submit - reported by many users for over a year - never resolved by Coursera. But for the course itself, it was highly redundant - going into longwinded explanations over several videos of very simple things, often covered in the prior course.