Thanks Phillip! Excellent feed back after practice, always show new way how!\n\nReally good material, is a real open door for a Google concepts! Is a way to start to thinking in Google Cloud Architect
It was a wonderful course were I got to understand principles involved in business logic, determining youreaSLA, SLI and SLO and so many other design principles relevant for an end product scale.
автор: Sreedhar R P•
There are some discrepancies in the steps given to the console and some labs did not get updated with score even after performing steps correctly as verified by Qwiklabs support team.
автор: Ramin O•
This version was great for reviewing GCP tools but I felt the older version was The previous version went deeper into architecture which seems to be the purpose of this course.
автор: Robert A•
Clear content and approaches. The Qwiklab intros are required to teach new users but should not count for grading purposes as they do not provide product understanding value.
автор: Paul A•
Very good and covered lots of useful aspects.
however it did not include documents of the relavant information as per previous module to refer to following training.
автор: Jani P•
Definitely the most interesting, hands-on and practical course in the Cloud Architect path. Only wish there was a little less emphasis on Deployment Manager...
автор: NAINA B•
It is a better course for learning more about cloud computing. The video clips in this course makes better way to understand more about cloud computing.
автор: Robert L•
Still could use some clearer step by step instructions in the labs, but this seems to bed a consistent thing across most Google learning certificates.
love these course, because the labs were easy to understand ,and the proffessors took their time in explaining each topic,was an amazing experience.
автор: Jeff M•
Really enjoyed most of it, but tend to use the GUI more than the Console, so many of the labs wee not geared to the wy I configure resources
автор: Michael W•
The class was useful and provides a good architectural template. Some lab activities need to be updated to reflect current environments.
автор: Nabor R J•
Some of the videos could be updated to show the content the speaker is sharing. However, there is a lot of great material in this course.
автор: Hakim R•
interesting and complete course; well presented. The volume is not constant (stronger would be better) ;and the slides are not provided.
автор: Subir S•
A couple of times I couldn't complete the lab successfully as the Cloud Shell icon on the console remained disabled. Quite frustrating.
автор: Madhur P•
The course correctly touched upon all essentials we have learned so far in various modules and explained yaml in mor detailed labs
автор: Jothilingam R•
If courses 2 to 6 is more interactive like course 1 it will be great. Course 6 is very vague it should have been more interactive.
автор: Deen L•
I wish there is no time limit or longer time limit to the labs so there is more time for students to tinker around GCP and explore
автор: Ted G•
There is a lot of content to cover. It is high-level but it does give you somewhat of an idea on building Google based solutions.
автор: Oskar E•
Mostly good, but there was some issue with the first quicklabs. I wasn't able to get it to register 100% no matter what I tried.
автор: Julian O•
Not as well structured as previous courses in the specialization, but covers very helpful topics in an understandable manner.
автор: Tsimafei M•
no sync in subtitles
автор: Kirill M•
I'd prefer to combine some of the items into a one course and reduce the total number of courses in the specialization.
автор: Robin S•
Nice practice scenarios. Would have been even better if more details were provided as part of solutions to challenges.
автор: Anuja P S•
The lab provided in the course helps learner to under the basics of google cloud platform. Overall its a good course.
автор: Abdul I•
I have learn lot about application resilliency, scalability, data recovery, security, SLA & SLO and incident response
автор: Yevheniy B•
sometimes they were talking too much without pointing out required details (lots of water). but useful in general