Chevron Left
Вернуться к Reliable Google Cloud Infrastructure: Design and Process

Отзывы учащихся о курсе Reliable Google Cloud Infrastructure: Design and Process от партнера Google Cloud

4.7
звезд
Оценки: 6,298
Рецензии: 626

О курсе

This course equips students to build highly reliable and efficient solutions on Google Cloud using proven design patterns. It is a continuation of the Architecting with Google Compute Engine or Architecting with Google Kubernetes Engine courses and assumes hands-on experience with the technologies covered in either of those courses. Through a combination of presentations, design activities, and hands-on labs, participants learn to define and balance business and technical requirements to design Google Cloud deployments that are highly reliable, highly available, secure, and cost-effective....

Лучшие рецензии

MB
10 сент. 2020 г.

Thanks Phillip! Excellent feed back after practice, always show new way how!\n\nReally good material, is a real open door for a Google concepts! Is a way to start to thinking in Google Cloud Architect

RI
27 авг. 2019 г.

It was a wonderful course were I got to understand principles involved in business logic, determining youreaSLA, SLI and SLO and so many other design principles relevant for an end product scale.

Фильтр по:

576–600 из 621 отзывов о курсе Reliable Google Cloud Infrastructure: Design and Process

автор: Sipho M

24 окт. 2019 г.

hard

автор: Muhammad A N

6 февр. 2019 г.

Good

автор: Ying K N

15 июля 2018 г.

Good

автор: Nuril F R

23 апр. 2021 г.

hm

автор: Aris I

12 февр. 2021 г.

ok

автор: Vishwa S

3 мар. 2019 г.

Good informative, but too long compared to previous courses. I recommended breaking it into 3 weeks instead of 2. Would like to see Jason Baker speak a little slow without talking too fast. I had to watch few times to grasp the all the information. However, the slides are really good. The challenges and that logging application idea gives a good understanding. The lab is kind of disappointing, I expected it to have more content with better organization.

автор: Henrik H

4 окт. 2019 г.

The course was good. Good content, but there was so many errors and corrections in the slide decks, transcript errors and video errors. I find this unprofessional considering this is a recorded course and there should have been so many opportunities to correct those.

Also so many anecdotes that just made this course longer than necessary.

автор: Marko V

2 янв. 2019 г.

Jason Baker is a great teacher. Finally a course in this certification that had a real teacher instead of human robots. Other instructors in the this course were just another robots making noise and not really contributing or teaching much.

автор: Tyler W

26 мая 2021 г.

Didn't like it. Doesn't quite fit, and requires a TON of repetitive tasks. The k8s pieces should be broken out and separated from the rest and delivered with the rest of the compute options earlier in the learning path.

автор: Neil S

24 февр. 2021 г.

the design activity videos were difficult to really get into - coming up with an application and each part of it and how each thing works is a good excercise but don't think it works in a digital training course

автор: Zlatan B

25 апр. 2019 г.

A lot of technical problems, the sound volume between two speakers is 80% off, the first quicklab makes no sense, does not let you move forward, the lectures are kind of butchered etc.

автор: Ranjith K

9 окт. 2019 г.

this course was the most boring of all. All the other courses were nice and flawless. I had much interest throughout other courses in this specialization but this one held me back.

автор: hleb v

16 февр. 2019 г.

one trainer is speaking too quietly. another one is speaking in a hurry, swallowing sound and words, making mistakes. without subtitles it's impossible to understand them.

автор: Dilip K

17 мая 2021 г.

When I initiated this session, it started with wrong module somewhere in between. It is not a good sign for google. Connect with me if you need any details.

автор: John E

12 июля 2018 г.

If you went through the other five courses, the lectures and lab here are overlap.Also the labs are harder to follow in this module that the prior 5.

автор: Vinicius O

22 июля 2020 г.

The premise is good, but the course and activities are kinda boring. Maybe it would be good to have practical exercises in each module.

автор: Qingsheng L

1 окт. 2019 г.

It's too fast... I know you guys want to zip in as much information as possible but this course is really too hard to catch up with.

автор: Marco M

29 апр. 2019 г.

Some labs were not working at the time I tried... issue seemed resolved by the time I reached the end of the course.

автор: Aakash K

22 окт. 2019 г.

This course is not good as other than in which we are not able to under stand quick lab what he is want in his lab

автор: Nishant

6 июня 2018 г.

Lab3 deployment didn't work. Followed the lab. Gives me something to troubleshoot later if I use that template.

автор: Giovanni V

22 мар. 2020 г.

Useful because it's a summary of the first four courses.

The LAB activities are very trivial, not so interesting.

автор: Weikang S

21 февр. 2019 г.

course content could be refined and edited; currently it is more of a presentation.

автор: Dhruv S

29 авг. 2019 г.

This course is cool but labs and practical learnings could have been more better!!

автор: Davit B

8 дек. 2019 г.

It should have more practice, but turned out to be more theory.

автор: A B

25 февр. 2019 г.

instructor seems knowledgeable and fun, but he'd speak slower .