SP
17 февр. 2017 г.
Well structured course. Gives a good overview of the basics of cloud computing. couple of typos in the transcripts. will flag errors in future courses
GX
22 окт. 2020 г.
Basic understanding of benchmark skills of Cloud Computing. If could share the combined slides of different lectures, could be better!
автор: Dhiraj s
•15 янв. 2017 г.
Highly recommended .Wonderful course and good content but a bit slow ..Could have been faster.
автор: gaurav
•11 июля 2019 г.
Should include some progrmming assignment. Also, some practice on the real cloud.
автор: Margerite B
•29 янв. 2018 г.
Very theoretical course. Lots of information. For me it was a little bit to much.
автор: ShiBo Z
•4 окт. 2016 г.
Wish there will be some lab assignments, for example doing some real work on AWS.
автор: Javier Y M
•3 апр. 2017 г.
The content was interesting, but it was too much theory, sometimes a bit borring
автор: Chau N
•7 июля 2017 г.
Lectures are a bit long, causing me to lose focus sometimes.
автор: Iga R
•15 февр. 2019 г.
interesting topics but explanation is sometimes unclear
автор: Rakesh C
•6 янв. 2018 г.
Good subject. The pace of the course is a little slow.
автор: Aditya K
•31 июля 2018 г.
I would have loved less content and more deep dive.
автор: Alex T
•14 янв. 2017 г.
Not enough depth.
автор: Ishrat T T
•5 июня 2020 г.
this is helpful,
автор: Kalpana T
•22 янв. 2022 г.
good
автор: Nandhini.J
•27 сент. 2020 г.
Easy
автор: ANITA S K R
•27 сент. 2020 г.
Good
автор: Kevin R
•2 сент. 2016 г.
This course is neither high level nor low level. After having taking Cloud Computing Concepts Part I and 2 (which were excellent), I expected a continuation of the very deep level of technical material. This course doesn't do this. Instead it is sort of much higher level except that the instructor fails to stay at the high level and will suddenly go deep - but without providing the detail so that someone to whom this is new will be totally lost. Given that I was expecting the technical depth of CCC parts 1 and 2, I already had much of the knowledge that was presented and could figure out what the instructor was trying to present, but I felt bad for someone who wasn't already familiar with the material. It is my opinion that the course needs to be taken offline and redone.
Note: Apparently I took a prior version of CCC parts 1 and 2 so my comments on those two courses may or may not apply anymore.
автор: Jerry Z
•9 янв. 2021 г.
The class is provided at a very high level and did not include enough examples to explain the concept. Roy Campbell cannot talk in a cohesive manner, and sounds not well prepared for the recordings. I am very familiar very a huge portion of the class concepts in practice but is having a hard time following the dry lectures. The quiz is surprisingly educational and well organized.
автор: Yaron K
•27 авг. 2017 г.
A list of Cloud technologies and Services, but without use-cases *clearly* highlighting the differences between them, their relative strengths and limitations and explaining what should be used when [except for the various Amazon storage offerings]. Gave it two stars and not one because the lecturers are enthusiastic about the subject matter and they did try to give use-cases.
автор: Chuxing C
•9 сент. 2016 г.
Coming out from two very good predecessors (C3, parts 1&2), this course is somewhat a disappointment. The contents are too broad without real focused depth, and too much time spent on background info in almost all lectures. There ought to be more hands-on practices, and the assessments should be more challenging towards understanding, rather than matching terms.
автор: Gideon P
•25 янв. 2018 г.
The teachers were just reading off of slides, quizzes were passable without ever watching the content, course followed no structure.
автор: Suresh V
•15 июня 2019 г.
I am disappointed with this course. The course content was designed and developed in a hurry as it seems to me.
автор: Olivier D
•22 нояб. 2016 г.
Interresting, but too easy to understand. Not much details. Very easy course, but you won't learn a lot.
автор: Anton T
•6 мая 2018 г.
Too vague. Hard to understand applicability and required environment for presented technologies.
автор: Amar P
•13 окт. 2016 г.
It tries to cover a lot of ground. Lack of some practical tasks.
автор: Zhaoyang L
•9 июня 2019 г.
Like Wikipedia on some popular cloud products.
автор: Weidong X
•1 окт. 2019 г.
I learned a little about a lot of things.