Отзывы учащихся о курсе Разработка и интерпретация клинических исследований от партнера Университет Джонса Хопкинса
О курсе
Лучшие рецензии
TS
3 июля 2018 г.
High quality course ! covering important areas and detailed lectures, more and better than a mere introduction. Congrats ! My only regret : I'd have liked to hear more about NI and equivalence trials
JQ
25 окт. 2019 г.
Excellent beginner course on design and interpretation of clinical trials, complements a lot of what I reviewed on my classes and I would like to take a more advanced course on the topic. Thank you.
651–675 из 688 отзывов о курсе Разработка и интерпретация клинических исследований
автор: Megan D
•27 апр. 2020 г.
Very informative, and great overview
автор: ELISA M
•5 июня 2019 г.
The good basis of clinical trials
автор: Jennifer R R
•16 июля 2021 г.
Engaging materials and visuals.
автор: Ilunga M
•28 июня 2020 г.
I wanted to learn more and more
автор: Miguel M V
•26 авг. 2020 г.
would have wanted more content
автор: Angela J
•21 окт. 2016 г.
Good introductory course.
автор: abdullah B
•9 нояб. 2019 г.
it was very good class
автор: Kamesh G
•23 окт. 2016 г.
Great work! Thank you.
автор: Ernesto G G
•21 нояб. 2021 г.
Very Good, Than You!
автор: Suha A
•29 авг. 2021 г.
Nice ,clear course
автор: Sumit S
•20 дек. 2017 г.
Excellent course.
автор: Rahma m
•26 дек. 2018 г.
Excellent course
автор: FERNANDO C
•29 сент. 2018 г.
It was amagazin
автор: Qier W
•19 сент. 2020 г.
Great teacher!
автор: SHIYONA N
•22 авг. 2020 г.
Usefull course
автор: Muhammed E M
•5 авг. 2020 г.
Good course !
автор: Xiaomin W
•22 дек. 2020 г.
Very good!
автор: Natalia R
•19 янв. 2020 г.
Very good!
автор: ALFREDO H
•28 окт. 2019 г.
excelente
автор: AHMED F
•26 июня 2022 г.
Od ne
автор: Adeola A
•5 янв. 2017 г.
great
автор: barah k a
•10 мар. 2017 г.
good
автор: Soujanya K
•14 июля 2022 г.
O
автор: Konstantinos P
•9 июня 2022 г.
A lot of useful information is included, however the presentation of this information and the examples given are not practical enough. I would personally prefer e.g.including repeating a standardized approach to evaluating research papers/ designing virtual examples of clinical trials multiple times, to get a more practical sense of how this information is applied, as well as building useful habits.
автор: colleen m
•26 июня 2022 г.
The course was interesting and informative but, the discussion was lacking. There were several discussion forums where I was hoping for a comment from an instructor to clarify and discuss the answers but, I was not able to find where the instructors had engaged at all. It was kind of disappointing and left me feeling like my understanding of the subject was being left incomplete.
Coursera Footer
