Chevron Left
Вернуться к Разработка и интерпретация клинических исследований

Отзывы учащихся о курсе Разработка и интерпретация клинических исследований от партнера Университет Джонса Хопкинса

Оценки: 4,098

О курсе

Clinical trials are experiments designed to evaluate new interventions to prevent or treat disease in humans. The interventions evaluated can be drugs, devices (e.g., hearing aid), surgeries, behavioral interventions (e.g., smoking cessation program), community health programs (e.g. cancer screening programs) or health delivery systems (e.g., special care units for hospital admissions). We consider clinical trials experiments because the investigators rather than the patients or their doctors select the treatment the patients receive. Results from randomized clinical trials are usually considered the highest level of evidence for determining whether a treatment is effective because trials incorporates features to ensure that evaluation of the benefits and risks of treatments are objective and unbiased. The FDA requires that drugs or biologics (e.g., vaccines) are shown to be effective in clinical trials before they can be sold in the US. The course will explain the basic principles for design of randomized clinical trials and how they should be reported. In the first part of the course, students will be introduced to terminology used in clinical trials and the several common designs used for clinical trials, such as parallel and cross-over designs. We will also explain some of the mechanics of clinical trials, like randomization and blinding of treatment. In the second half of the course, we will explain how clinical trials are analyzed and interpreted. Finally, we will review the essential ethical consideration involved in conducting experiments on people....

Лучшие рецензии


3 июля 2018 г.

High quality course ! covering important areas and detailed lectures, more and better than a mere introduction. Congrats ! My only regret : I'd have liked to hear more about NI and equivalence trials


4 июня 2020 г.

I would highly recommend this course as I found it well-structured and helpful. After studying all the materials, I gained a great amount of knowledge in designing and interpretating clinical trail.

Фильтр по:

651–675 из 688 отзывов о курсе Разработка и интерпретация клинических исследований

автор: Megan D

27 апр. 2020 г.

Very informative, and great overview

автор: ELISA M

5 июня 2019 г.

The good basis of clinical trials

автор: Jennifer R R

16 июля 2021 г.

Engaging materials and visuals.

автор: Ilunga M

28 июня 2020 г.

I wanted to learn more and more

автор: Miguel M V

26 авг. 2020 г.

would have wanted more content

автор: Angela J

21 окт. 2016 г.

Good introductory course.

автор: abdullah B

9 нояб. 2019 г.

it was very good class

автор: Kamesh G

23 окт. 2016 г.

Great work! Thank you.

автор: Ernesto G G

21 нояб. 2021 г.

Very Good, Than You!

автор: Suha A

29 авг. 2021 г.

Nice ,clear course

автор: Sumit S

20 дек. 2017 г.

Excellent course.

автор: Rahma m

26 дек. 2018 г.

Excellent course


29 сент. 2018 г.

It was amagazin

автор: Qier W

19 сент. 2020 г.

Great teacher!

автор: SHIYONA N

22 авг. 2020 г.

Usefull course

автор: Muhammed E M

5 авг. 2020 г.

Good course !

автор: Xiaomin W

22 дек. 2020 г.

Very good!

автор: Natalia R

19 янв. 2020 г.

Very good!

автор: ALFREDO H

28 окт. 2019 г.


автор: AHMED F

26 июня 2022 г.

Od ne

автор: Adeola A

5 янв. 2017 г.


автор: barah k a

10 мар. 2017 г.


автор: Soujanya K

14 июля 2022 г.


автор: Konstantinos P

9 июня 2022 г.

A lot of useful information is included, however the presentation of this information and the examples given are not practical enough. I would personally prefer e.g.including repeating a standardized approach to evaluating research papers/ designing virtual examples of clinical trials multiple times, to get a more practical sense of how this information is applied, as well as building useful habits.

автор: colleen m

26 июня 2022 г.

The course was interesting and informative but, the discussion was lacking. There were several discussion forums where I was hoping for a comment from an instructor to clarify and discuss the answers but, I was not able to find where the instructors had engaged at all. It was kind of disappointing and left me feeling like my understanding of the subject was being left incomplete.