TS
3 июля 2018 г.
High quality course ! covering important areas and detailed lectures, more and better than a mere introduction. Congrats ! My only regret : I'd have liked to hear more about NI and equivalence trials
OS
18 сент. 2019 г.
This course would be most useful to the participant if pursued within a short time-frame, of maximum of 6 weeks. Both lecturers were clear and good communicators. I would take more of their classes.
автор: gabriel c
•9 нояб. 2019 г.
it was very good class
автор: Kamesh G
•23 окт. 2016 г.
Great work! Thank you.
автор: Ernesto G G
•21 нояб. 2021 г.
Very Good, Than You!
автор: Suha A
•29 авг. 2021 г.
Nice ,clear course
автор: Sumit S
•20 дек. 2017 г.
Excellent course.
автор: Rahma m
•26 дек. 2018 г.
Excellent course
автор: FERNANDO C
•29 сент. 2018 г.
It was amagazin
автор: Qier W
•19 сент. 2020 г.
Great teacher!
автор: 24 S N
•22 авг. 2020 г.
Usefull course
автор: Muhammed E M
•5 авг. 2020 г.
Good course !
автор: Xiaomin W
•22 дек. 2020 г.
Very good!
автор: natalia r
•19 янв. 2020 г.
Very good!
автор: ALFREDO H
•28 окт. 2019 г.
excelente
автор: AHMED F
•26 июня 2022 г.
Od ne
автор: Adeola A
•5 янв. 2017 г.
great
автор: barah k a
•10 мар. 2017 г.
good
автор: Ioannis K G
•8 мая 2022 г.
I think it is a course for the beginners that have already a basic knowledge of statistics. It is a course that gives you an idea about clinical trials design but it doesn't go into deep. Another fact is also that while it mentions other than RCT design it mainly focuses on randomization. I think it has to be: 1) wider, including other clinical trials designs, 2) go a little bit more deep in randomization process with more explanations and examples 3) improved the video lectures: sometimes the talking is fast during the presentation.
автор: Konstantinos P
•9 июня 2022 г.
A lot of useful information is included, however the presentation of this information and the examples given are not practical enough. I would personally prefer e.g.including repeating a standardized approach to evaluating research papers/ designing virtual examples of clinical trials multiple times, to get a more practical sense of how this information is applied, as well as building useful habits.
автор: colleen m
•26 июня 2022 г.
The course was interesting and informative but, the discussion was lacking. There were several discussion forums where I was hoping for a comment from an instructor to clarify and discuss the answers but, I was not able to find where the instructors had engaged at all. It was kind of disappointing and left me feeling like my understanding of the subject was being left incomplete.
автор: Marcus C
•16 июля 2017 г.
Was alright, but felt a bit short of content. Some more interactive assignments, questionnaires and examples would be nice.
автор: Robert W
•27 авг. 2019 г.
for me personally the level was to basic. Having said that, it gives a good overview on clinical trial designs.
автор: Bruna d A P
•26 мар. 2020 г.
The content was very well prepared, but i think most of the Topics can not be applie
автор: Marilia C
•31 авг. 2017 г.
Good course as an introduction of the topic.
автор: Xin W
•3 янв. 2017 г.
presentation is poor, not very engaging
автор: Nicolas C
•11 июня 2017 г.
Interesting, but a little elementary.