The course presents the topics in a non-linear manner. It should be called "Learning graphs with C++"

sir,is very experienced person in this field but also too old to teach such complecated lesson.

It was very good for as a beginner but this will be better if it is practical in the software

The course has enough materials but the assignments are too lengthy and not well formulated.

the course could've been more interesting if uncommon things weren't select to be taught

This course very helpful to me the better theory lesson and explanation.

Peer graded assignment checking system doesn't seem quite right to me.

Tutor's tone will bring you into sleep, but the content is good

i learnt a lot of things i did not know before.

thank you

Mediocre, too much graph theory, too less C++ feature

it is a good course and very helpful to us

good course but trainer doesnt go in deep

Focus on history can be reduced.

Wasn't for me, I suppose

little bit confusing

Not much working

Not that detail.

good course

average

Good

Five star contents and format of lectures from Ira Pohl.

Peer graded assignments marred by hordes of students handing in plagiarised submissions and rating each other 100%. As well as openly asking for exam answers on the official discussion board. No policing of code-of-conduct.

Passing the course requires you to peer review a number of assignments from fellow students. If you report a submission as plagiarised it is removed from the review queue. At some point there are no more submissions to review. You are then not able to complete you peer reviews and fail the assignment. In the end you have to accept plagiarised submissions in order to be able to do the mandatory peer reviews. System is rigged against cracking down on plagiarised contents.

I gave this course two star for taking my responsibility. The course is bad designed. The homework has less clue and you may only find 50% or less related knowledge from the lectures. The final quiz is ridiculous (too many questions about number calculation and I cannot believe there are questions like what did D. Ritchie B. Stroustrup E. Dijkstra L. Euler do or invent?!!!). It seems that the professor or his assistant did not put too much effort into providing this course. Though I learned something from it and it pushed me to learn several c++ skills, in a google searching way.

The video sessions are nice and very informative. However, the examples in the videos are a "toy" compared to the assignment of implementing a Monte Carlo simulation for Dijkstra's algo. The directions in the description of the assignment are very poorly written and the specs are blurry and difficult to clarify by yourself. The MST assignment is much easier, but still the directions are not well prepared.

no Chinese subtitles and it is really hard for me to figure all the English subtitles and knowledge. I feel that upset concerning no Chinese translation and I think it should be improved sooner or later. or Chinese learners like me would not learn as much as students who have English as their mother languages.

Very superficial. I found that I know c++ to a limited extent, and that for practical uses I must learn a significant amount of information from other sources. In short, this course is an introduction but does not give you enough tools to call yourself a c++ programmer.