Отзывы учащихся о курсе Divide and Conquer, Sorting and Searching, and Randomized Algorithms от партнера Стэнфордский университет
О курсе
Лучшие рецензии
KS
13 сент. 2018 г.
Well researched. Topics covered well, with walkthrough for exam.le cases for each new introduced algorithm. Great experience, learned a lot of important algorithms and algorithmic thinking practices.
DT
26 мая 2020 г.
Thank you for teaching me this course. I learned a lot of new things, including Divide-and-Conquer, MergeSort, QuickSort, and Randomization Algorithms, along with proof for their asymptotic runtime
876–900 из 919 отзывов о курсе Divide and Conquer, Sorting and Searching, and Randomized Algorithms
автор: Utsav S
•4 июня 2020 г.
excellent ,what i most need was asymptotic analysis
автор: Anish K
•30 авг. 2017 г.
Very fun, interactive and downright helpful course.
автор: Yasir M
•9 июня 2020 г.
Should be more precise in code. It's too vague
автор: Dragonphy W
•13 окт. 2018 г.
It's good enough but lack of thorough analysis
автор: Yash K
•14 мая 2017 г.
Requires a bit of Math background for proofs!
автор: Simon R
•13 февр. 2020 г.
Interesting and well explained. Well done.
автор: Deepika G
•26 апр. 2019 г.
Loved the content and detailed lectures.
автор: Toader A
•6 дек. 2020 г.
Mentor help is almost non-existent.
автор: Dipankar M
•10 мая 2020 г.
Very nice course with good faculty.
автор: de P S
•8 авг. 2020 г.
interesting and challenging course
автор: Suhui L
•24 апр. 2022 г.
The profofessor speaaks too fast
автор: Artem S
•23 апр. 2017 г.
Sometimes too much mathematics.
автор: Sanul R
•19 сент. 2018 г.
MORE OF THEORY LESS OF SOLVING
автор: Michael L
•19 дек. 2018 г.
This course is excellent...
автор: Shouvik G
•3 авг. 2018 г.
good.but, he is so fast!
автор: Tejas P
•14 июня 2018 г.
well explained sir..!!!
автор: Tabrez M
•28 апр. 2020 г.
good explanation
автор: 张之晗(ZhiHan Z
•27 авг. 2017 г.
so challenging
автор: Shuvro C D
•10 сент. 2021 г.
good course
автор: Thành N K
•29 июня 2019 г.
very hard
автор: Prachi M
•25 июня 2017 г.
Excellent
автор: E.Naveen K
•30 нояб. 2016 г.
Great
автор: Parag K D
•3 апр. 2022 г.
good
автор: Bianca D
•26 янв. 2019 г.
Took me way more than 7 hours/week to go through course materials and complete the problem sets and programming assignments. Closer to 10. In general the estimates for how much time each assignment takes is way off (often claiming on the order of minutes, when the reality is for most students (myself included) it is likely on the order of hours).
That said, the programming assignments were challenging and fun (especially trying to do them in JavaScript), and I feel much more comfortable with recursion and Big-Oh.
The forums for the current session are not very active, but there are a lot of old posts from past offerings of the course, and I found that most of the time others had similar questions to me.
The textbook was helpful, but it pretty much has the same content as the lectures with maybe some extra practice and challenge problems. Unfortunately not all solutions to those problems are available, which can be very frustrating (I noticed at least one practice problem with no solution was used on the final exam, so that’s probably why...).
This course is a little more academic than practical in my opinion as a software engineer, but you have to start somewhere.
автор: Peter C
•12 февр. 2017 г.
I was glad to get exposure to famous algorithms through this class, but I don't feel like I really developed an intuition for reasoning about their runtime. The class was challenging, but mostly for the wrong reasons. I spent more time and energy pouring over the answers to tricky quizzes and having to implement algorithms exactly as described in the lecture notes rather than really truly learning. It also took me much longer than the 4-8 hours per week advertised to complete each week.
Coursera Footer
