Chevron Left
Вернуться к Algorithmic Toolbox

Отзывы учащихся о курсе Algorithmic Toolbox от партнера Калифорнийский университет в Сан-Диего

Оценки: 11,258
Рецензии: 2,383

О курсе

This online course covers basic algorithmic techniques and ideas for computational problems arising frequently in practical applications: sorting and searching, divide and conquer, greedy algorithms, dynamic programming. We will learn a lot of theory: how to sort data and how it helps for searching; how to break a large problem into pieces and solve them recursively; when it makes sense to proceed greedily; how dynamic programming is used in genomic studies. You will practice solving computational problems, designing new algorithms, and implementing solutions efficiently (so that they run in less than a second)....

Лучшие рецензии

19 янв. 2017 г.

I liked the fact that the algorithms are not just the introductory searching and sorting algorithms. The assignments are fairly difficult (I have decent scripting experience), but not impossibly so.

19 янв. 2021 г.

The course was really amazing which provided deep knowledge from basic to advance that how algorithms works and how to design algorithms. Thanks to all the expert teachers who taught in this course.

Фильтр по:

2276–2300 из 2,331 отзывов о курсе Algorithmic Toolbox

автор: Tsz Y W

28 июля 2016 г.

These two stars go to the instructor in week 1. I left the course after week 3 because I couldn't tolerate the accents of the instructors. I got frustrated starting from week 2 where I have to reread the subtitles to understand the material. Please let someone who can speak English fluently teach the course, please. The course goes kinds of fast, this is first course of the Specialization and it quickly jumps to Greedy algorithm, really? In general Algorithm course, it is usually taught late.

автор: Fabio B

16 авг. 2021 г.

Course material is good, but assistance is zero.

If I am paying for a course, I expect some assistance in order to succeed.

I am talking about feedback about my questions, or the grading system showing test case data in case your code fails.

Because that's what happened to me and because there's no test data, I don't know why my code fails, therefore I am stuck and no learning can happen. For a paid learning this is unacceptable.

автор: Emilio B

25 янв. 2017 г.

The videos and explanations are very poor. Most of the time the instructors are reading off a script, and everything feels fake. By reading off a script they are forced to "hand-wave" and do not explain concepts covered completely.

The only thing I liked about this course were the problem sets, which were interesting to do. Will not buy rest of specialization, feels like this is just a cash cow for UCSD.

автор: Richard Z

4 мая 2019 г.

I would say that the lecture part of this course is quite poor. The professor presents abstract concepts and pseudo-code without giving an example. It takes me a long time to figure out what the professor wants to say. He should've given out the example before explaining the concepts. The contents though is decent, and I learn a lot in his course.

автор: PRATIK A

4 июня 2017 г.

Course content was good. Explanation of various problems, solutions and algorithms could be made easier to understand by providing more (intuitive) examples. Overall, the course is good at gaining broad understanding of the different paradigms of algorithms.

автор: Hussein F

18 окт. 2021 г.

T​he course is Highly dependable on math concepts and some of the examples are pure math,which means if some doesn't have a solid math foundation,it will be difficult for him to get the full concepts clearly , also the assisments is not effecient.

автор: Morgan S

5 дек. 2020 г.

The lectures are well done; however, the course should be deprecated. There are no active mentors and the directions and exercises do not reconcile. Lastly, the PyCharm package is prone to bugs.

автор: Piyush J

20 дек. 2019 г.

I Didn't find it useful for learning as a beginner in algorithms and data structures. The level of the assignments was way too high than the content covered in the lectures and study material.

автор: Alexander T

5 июня 2017 г.

The time claimed as required for this course is wildly off.. It takes at least 3 times more than 4 hours, allotted for the weekly assignments. In a way, this makes this course very expensive.

автор: Stavros M

8 янв. 2021 г.

Some instructors are unqualified to be instructors. They may be good as scientists but not for instructors. That may be sounds harsh but it is the truth. I would not reccommend it.

автор: Sammya M

3 июня 2020 г.

Explanations are unnecessarily confusing and of very poor quality especially from week 5. One already has to be an expert in algorithms before taking this course.

автор: KISHOR

14 дек. 2020 г.

This courser does not give a good explanation of the topics specified in the course syllabus.

Without good resources it is very difficult to solve the problems .

автор: Sulthan k

25 апр. 2020 г.

The language of the lecturer is soo noisy and can't understand the words.

After Listening to the first lecture itself I'm unenrolling from the course.

автор: Die J

4 мая 2016 г.

Feedback in assignment is not good enough.

For example, for the points and segment, there are no correct answer in output as a reference.

автор: saksham s

30 дек. 2020 г.

Teachers and faculties are not very good at explanation. Moreover all of them had boring faces like they are not interested to teach us.

автор: Amit B

19 сент. 2020 г.

The content should be more beginner friendly. It quickly transitions pace to intermediate level. I found week 3 to 5 very difficult.

автор: kamal

16 нояб. 2017 г.

The programming technique - like DP, Greedy could have been better. I had to go to other website to better understand the concepts.

автор: Alberto N

8 июля 2021 г.

Poorly explanied in half of the course like Dynamic Programming, and all Pavel parts exluding the Change Problem

автор: Jian W

20 авг. 2019 г.

Some Algorithm are not clear, and the homework submission system is not friendly at all!

автор: Bhushan N

14 мая 2021 г.

Things are just too complicated. Course could have easily been made easy to understand.

автор: Sonia R

15 июля 2017 г.

Teaching technique can be better and more interesting. Not so suitable for beginners.

автор: Ahmad M

6 июня 2020 г.

Was useful to week 4

after that the explanation of the algorithms became very poor

автор: Sakib A K

21 авг. 2020 г.

Need To improve more about clearing the topics and also the assignment.


11 июля 2021 г.

Videos are not sufficient to clear all the assignment problems.

автор: salman k

11 апр. 2020 г.

The course is not very specific for my subjects .