Chevron Left
Вернуться к Algorithmic Toolbox

Отзывы учащихся о курсе Algorithmic Toolbox от партнера Калифорнийский университет в Сан-Диего

4.6
звезд
Оценки: 11,254
Рецензии: 2,383

О курсе

This online course covers basic algorithmic techniques and ideas for computational problems arising frequently in practical applications: sorting and searching, divide and conquer, greedy algorithms, dynamic programming. We will learn a lot of theory: how to sort data and how it helps for searching; how to break a large problem into pieces and solve them recursively; when it makes sense to proceed greedily; how dynamic programming is used in genomic studies. You will practice solving computational problems, designing new algorithms, and implementing solutions efficiently (so that they run in less than a second)....

Лучшие рецензии

SG
19 янв. 2017 г.

I liked the fact that the algorithms are not just the introductory searching and sorting algorithms. The assignments are fairly difficult (I have decent scripting experience), but not impossibly so.

BD
19 янв. 2021 г.

The course was really amazing which provided deep knowledge from basic to advance that how algorithms works and how to design algorithms. Thanks to all the expert teachers who taught in this course.

Фильтр по:

2176–2200 из 2,330 отзывов о курсе Algorithmic Toolbox

автор: Moaz M

14 нояб. 2020 г.

in general, the course is good, especially the assignments which were very good but the materials like videos and slides aren't good enough, i think that there is some important details are missing

автор: OM S

30 июня 2020 г.

very detailed and highly efficient course to learning algorithms but some more focus should be given to solve assignment problems...as they were very tough for a average guy like me...thank you

автор: Stefan M

31 мар. 2018 г.

Nick Rhodes' video sections are terrible: He stumbles, mumbles, and mis-speaks (words don't match slides). It would be fine for a live lecture, but for something pre-recorded, it's awful.

автор: Shubham C

14 июня 2017 г.

It was a good course...But the gene problem was left to be solved and on top of all please take instructors so can speak british english,It was quite difficult to understand their accent.

автор: pratik

29 янв. 2017 г.

1 professor just did not make sense to me. do not just read out the pseudo code but instead try to visually show whats happening step by step with arrows and calculations from scratch

автор: Khaled A

29 авг. 2020 г.

The course starts well but then falls especially in the dynamic programming part. The explanation should be at least comprehensible for those with an average level in mathematics.

автор: Abhishek S

19 апр. 2020 г.

There should be more illustrations and a more comprehensive introduction to every topic.

Discussion of a topic formally before introduction to the problems would be better.

автор: Sreenuj C M

2 янв. 2017 г.

The materials covered are not enough to fully explore the topics. Should include much more detailed explanations especially when explaining some of the complex algorithms.

автор: vikas g

27 апр. 2021 г.

The content of this course is good. The explanation in the lectures could have been better. But overall the course helped me learn some good algorithms. Thanks.

автор: Max K

9 апр. 2017 г.

Есть множество недочётов как в субтитрах, так и в самих слайдах. Кто-то употребляет Тета, кто-то О большое, субтитры ужасны, местами перевод совершенно не тот.

автор: Bhavya K

10 авг. 2020 г.

it was very difficult and sometimes very frustrating to understand some of the lecturer because of their very thick accent. other than that it was good.

автор: SAHIL S

15 июля 2020 г.

could not find out whats wrong with programming assignments. Atleast we should be able to see what test case we are failing. Assignments managed poorly.

автор: Nidhi G

13 мая 2020 г.

It could have been better with some programming examples. It became very difficult to grasp the algorithm especially in the dynamic programming section

автор: Rafael D d D

26 апр. 2020 г.

I find difficult to do the programming assigments without lots of extra reading and lectures from other sources. More explanation and examples needed

автор: Mick S

20 янв. 2018 г.

While it is possible to muddle through this course and retain some of it, understanding some higher math and Big O notation is pretty essential.

автор: MD. R H

29 июля 2020 г.

Dynamic programming sections should be more decorated and contained more lectures to improve gradually and create control over this topic...

автор: Ashish D

16 янв. 2020 г.

The pseudo-code is not that good to understand quickly. Please can you code in one language say C++? It will be easy to understand that way.

автор: Masudul H Q

8 июля 2017 г.

Some of the lectures are poorly explained, you'll need to review those 2-3 times to understand. Other than that, good course for beginners.

автор: Han, D

6 янв. 2020 г.

it would be better to change the way to submit assignment. its hard to coding in local and upload file every time to check my code.

автор: Calvin

22 сент. 2020 г.

The accent is sometimes difficult to understand. The course structure and syllabus are good but the assignments are very unclear.

автор: Ghumdan A

30 авг. 2019 г.

This course is very useful and widens one's brain. However, I always felt there was something missing in the explanation

автор: Ali A

26 июня 2017 г.

The best thing about this course is the assignments but the course material needs to be discussed in a better way

автор: Raghav K

2 июня 2020 г.

The person who teaches ...His accent is quite different and difficult to understand ..rest the course was good

автор: Maksat H

7 янв. 2017 г.

Lectures are very confusing. Instructors should use white boarding to explain codes. Difficult to follow them.

автор: Muskan J

5 июля 2020 г.

This course is great in providing lectures but programming assignments are so long it will take so much time