Chevron Left
Вернуться к Algorithmic Toolbox

Отзывы учащихся о курсе Algorithmic Toolbox от партнера Калифорнийский университет в Сан-Диего

4.6
звезд
Оценки: 10,130
Рецензии: 2,150

О курсе

The course covers basic algorithmic techniques and ideas for computational problems arising frequently in practical applications: sorting and searching, divide and conquer, greedy algorithms, dynamic programming. We will learn a lot of theory: how to sort data and how it helps for searching; how to break a large problem into pieces and solve them recursively; when it makes sense to proceed greedily; how dynamic programming is used in genomic studies. You will practice solving computational problems, designing new algorithms, and implementing solutions efficiently (so that they run in less than a second)....

Лучшие рецензии

BD
19 янв. 2021 г.

The course was really amazing which provided deep knowledge from basic to advance that how algorithms works and how to design algorithms. Thanks to all the expert teachers who taught in this course.

SG
19 янв. 2017 г.

I liked the fact that the algorithms are not just the introductory searching and sorting algorithms. The assignments are fairly difficult (I have decent scripting experience), but not impossibly so.

Фильтр по:

1976–2000 из 2,071 отзывов о курсе Algorithmic Toolbox

автор: Chibuokem J

25 июля 2020 г.

Great course content, but the delivery of lectures was really average and difficult to follow through

автор: G S R

17 июня 2020 г.

try to present more problems especially for dynamic programming and comes with a better explanation

автор: Mohand G F

4 авг. 2019 г.

Explanation needs lots of Improvement. The problems are very hard comparing to the explanation

автор: KOUSHIK H S

19 июня 2020 г.

The course lecture videos could have been more detailed and should cover all the algorithms

автор: Jayaprakash V

17 сент. 2017 г.

Algorithm Assignments at later weeks were tough and had an intention to opt out of course.

автор: Ashok R

13 сент. 2019 г.

The lectures were more narrative oriented and hence felt boring and monotonous at times.

автор: Amarjeet S

23 сент. 2020 г.

pretty hard course, person need to have prerequisite knowledge of better programming.

автор: PUSHPRAJSINH G P

16 авг. 2020 г.

lastly some proffessor with a russian accent make difficult to be understand

автор: Deleted A

13 сент. 2017 г.

I enjoyed it, but the instructor was a little hard to understand at times.

автор: SIDDHANT K

12 июля 2020 г.

Teaching exp. with writing and execution of example problems can be added

автор: Suraj S

21 сент. 2020 г.

dynamic programming not explained properly

i had to read it from outside

автор: Teja S P A

6 мая 2020 г.

the way of explanation can be improved (especially dynamic programming)

автор: Aabhas C

3 июня 2020 г.

Accent of teachers is very bad. The course could also be more refined.

автор: Omar K T

26 дек. 2019 г.

The course explanation was barely sufficient and often times confusing

автор: Mohamed O

17 сент. 2019 г.

Don't cover all the concept you have to search a lot to be good ..

автор: Dmitry G

18 нояб. 2016 г.

Homework was very nice, but strong accent of lecturers impeded me

автор: Jorge B O

31 дек. 2018 г.

no todos los videos tienen subtitulos o estan bien explicados

автор: Amr A M

31 авг. 2019 г.

course should be more fixable and provide IDE for run codes

автор: Parikshit R

15 авг. 2020 г.

Questions are real tough but , the overall course was good

автор: Dhananjay V

31 мая 2020 г.

I think the communication by tutors could have been better

автор: Mayur A 1

10 апр. 2020 г.

This lectures of this course must have been in more depth.

автор: Mayank M

10 июля 2020 г.

NEED TO IN MORE DEPTH AND MORE TOPICS NEED TO BE COVERED.

автор: Krikchai P

9 мая 2020 г.

subtitle does not match with audio.

unclear explanation.

автор: Kuldeep G

23 авг. 2020 г.

I think that video lectures can be made more detailed.

автор: kaveh f

23 янв. 2021 г.

Assignments are full of bugs, especially in Golang.